Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 09:01

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Do you think the number of sissies is on the rise?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Toyota Industries' shares nosedive on $33 billion buyout deal — steepest fall in 10 months - CNBC
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
If there is an abandoned house with no owner, can I live in it?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Brad Pitt Wears a Cobalt Blue Velvet Blazer and Barrel Jeans with Ines de Ramon - instyle.com
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Diet Sodas May Actually Be Raising Your Diabetes Risk, New Study Says - EatingWell
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What blowjob techniques do you use for your man to cum inside your mouth?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.